CASE SUMMARY
On August 23, 2021, a coalition of Wisconsin voters and voting rights organizations filed a federal lawsuit against the members of the Wisconsin Elections Commission challenging the state’s then-still-in-effect 2010-cycle legislative redistricting plans as malapportioned in violation of the one person, one vote constitutional requirement and the state’s lack of new redistricting plans as hindering their 1st Amendment rights to communicate and contribute to legislative candidates. They sought a judicial declaration the 2010-cycle legislative plans were unconstitutional, an injunction barring their use in future elections, and a court ordered schedule for adopting and implementing new redistricting plans if the Wisconsin Legislature and Governor were unable to do so in a timely manner.
- On September 16, 2021, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin consolidated this case with another challenge to Wisconsin’s redistricting plans, Hunter v. Bostelmann.
- On October 6, 2021, the district court granted a stay on the case in light of a redistricting challenge petition that had been recently accepted by the Wisconsin Supreme Court, Johnson v. Wisconsin Elections Commission. The stay was repeatedly extended by the court, ultimately extending until January 28, 2022.
- On March 3, 2022, the Wisconsin Supreme Court adopted final congressional and legislative plans in Johnson v. Wisconsin Elections Commission.
- On May 5, 2022, the federal district court dismissed the case, citing the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson.
Related Case: Hunter v. Bostelmann
Similar Case: Johnson v. Wisconsin Elections Commission
CASE LIBRARY
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin - No. 3:21-cv-534
- Complaint - 8/23/21
- Order Appointing Three-Judge Court - 8/26/21
- Parties Joint Proposal Regarding Scheduling - 9/13/21
- Plaintiffs' Statement Regarding Proposed Intervention - 9/13/21
- Opinion and Order - 9/16/21
- Motion to Intervene by the Proposed Plaintiff-Intervenors Citizen Data Scientists - 9/20/21
- Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Intervene by Proposed Plaintiff-Intervenors Citizen Data Scientists - 9/20/21
- Complaint of Intervenor-Plaintiffs - 9/21/21
- First Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief - 9/21/21
- Order - 9/21/21
- Notice of State Court Proceedings and Motion to Stay Proceedings - 9/23/21
- Notice by the Wisconsin Legislature - 9/23/21
- Notice by the Wisconsin Legislature of U.S. Supreme Court Petition - 9/24/21
- Motion to Dismiss BLOC Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint by the Wisconsin Legislature - 9/30/21
- Motion to Dismiss Johnson Intervenor-Plaintiffs' Complaint by the Wisconsin Legislature - 9/30/21
- Defendants' Answer to BLOC Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint - 9/30/21
- Intervenor-Defendant Governor Tony Evers' Response to Stay Motion - 10/1/21
- Response to Johnson Intervenor-Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion to Stay by the Wisconsin Legislature - 10/1/21
- Congressmen Glenn Grothman, et al.'s, Statement Regarding the Johnson Plaintiffs' Second Motion to Stay and the Wisconsin Supreme Court's Grant of Petition for Original Action in Johnson v. Wisconsin Elections Commission - 10/1/21
- Defendants' Response to Johnson Intervenor-Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay - 10/1/21
- Hunter Plaintiffs' Opposition to Johnson Intervenors' Second Motion to Stay Proceedings - 10/1/21
- Notice of Position of Proposed Plaintiff-Intervenor Citizen Data Scientists on Matters Raised in the Court's September 23, 2021 Order - 10/1/21
- BLOC Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition to Motion to Stay Proceedings - 10/1/21
- Declaration of Douglas M. Poland in Support of BLOC Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition to Motion to Stay Proceedings - 10/1/21
- Joint Proposed Discovery Plan and Pretrial Schedule - 10/1/21
- Plaintiffs' Conditional Motion for Leave to File Reply to Congressmen Glenn Grothman, et al.'s, Proposed Response - 10/4/21
- Johnson Intervenor-Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support of Motion to Stay Proceedings - 10/5/21
- Johnson Intervenor-Plaintiffs' Opposition to the Wisconsin Legislature's Motion to Dismiss - 10/6/21
- Opinion and Order - 10/6/21
- Intervenor-Defendant Governor Tony Evers' Answer to Amended Complaint - 10/7/21
- Congressmen Glenn Grothman, et al.'s, Motion to Dismiss the Johnson Plaintiffs' Complaint - 10/7/21
- Johnson Intervenor-Plaintiffs' Opposition to the Congressmen Intervenor-Defendants' Motion to Dismiss - 10/19/21
- BLOC Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition to Wisconsin Legislature's Motion to Dismiss - 10/20/21
- Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss BLOC Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint by the Wisconsin Legislature - 10/27/21
- Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Johnson Plaintiffs' Complaint by the Wisconsin Legislature - 10/27/21
- Congressmen Glenn Grothman, et al.'s, Reply in Support of Their Motion to Dismiss the Johnson Plaintiffs' Complaint - 10/27/21
- Joint Submission on Status of Proceedings in the Wisconsin Supreme Court - 11/5/21
- Order Continuing Stay Until December 6, 2021 - 11/17/21
- Plaintiffs' Expedited Motion for Status Conference - 2/24/22
- Johnson Intervenor-Plaintiffs' Position on Dismissal - 3/18/22
- Bostelmann, et al., Defendants' Statement on Dismissal - 3/18/22
- Intervenor-Defendant Governor Evers's Statement on Dismissal - 3/18/22
- BLOC Plaintiffs' Statement of Dismissal - 3/18/22
- Hunter Plaintiffs' Statement in Opposition to Dismissal - 3/18/22
- Congressmen Glenn Grothman's, et al., Position on Dismissal - 3/18/22
- The Wisconsin Legislature's Position on Dismissal - 3/18/22
- Johnson Intervenor-Plaintiffs' Updated Position on Dismissal - 3/25/22
- Congressmen Glenn Grothman, et al., Response to This Court's March 21, 2022 Order - 3/25/22
- BLOC Plaintiffs' Updated Position on Dismissal - 3/28/22
- Hunter Plaintiffs' Updated Statement in Opposition to Dismissal - 3/28/22
- Intervenor-Defendant Governor Tony Evers' Updated Statement of Position - 3/28/22
- The Wisconsin Legislature's Response Regarding Dismissal - 3/28/22
- Johnson Intervenor-Plaintiffs' Updated Position on Dismissal - 4/20/22
- The Wisconsin Legislature's Response Regarding Dismissal - 4/20/22
- Congressmen Glenn Grothman, et al., Response to This Court's April 1, 2022 Order - 4/20/22
- BLOC Plaintiffs' Position on Status - 4/20/22
- Intervenor-Defendant Governor Evers's Position on Status - 4/20/22
- Hunter Plaintiffs' Statement on Case Status - 4/20/22
- BLOC Plaintiffs' Updated Position on Status - 5/4/22
- Hunter Plaintiffs' Statement on Case Status - 5/4/22