CASE SUMMARY
On December 6, 2021, a former Montana Secretary of State and several Montana voters filed a federal lawsuit against Montana’s Secretary of State challenging the Montana Public Service Commission’s (PSC) five single-member districts, which hadn’t been redrawn since 2003 and had a population deviation of 24.5%, as violating the one person, one vote requirement under the 14th Amendment. Plaintiffs sought a judicial declaration the PSC plan was unconstitutional, an injunction barring its use in future elections, and an order either requiring the state to adopt a properly apportioned plan or adopting the court’s own plan.
- On January 13, 2022, a three-judge federal district court panel granted a preliminary injunction blocking the plan on the grounds the plaintiffs were likely to prevail on their claims.
- The district court panel held a bench trial on March 4, 2022.
- On March 8, the district court panel struck down the plan as unconstitutionally malapportioned, finding the PSC was subject to one person, one vote requirements as a statewide legislative body elected from single-member districts that exercises “general governmental powers” which broadly impact the general public. To ensure a proper plan was implemented in time for the 2022 election, the court adopted the defendant-Secretary of State’s proposed remedial plan for use in future elections absent any future action by the state legislature, citing the more stringent equal population requirements that apply to court-imposed redistricting plans and the deference that courts must give to a state’s redistricting policies and preferences.
CASE LIBRARY
U.S. District Court for the District of Montana, Helena Division - No. 6:21-cv-92
- Complaint - 12/6/21
- Order Appointing Three-Judge Panel - 12/9/21
- Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order - 12/17/21
- Plaintiffs' Brief in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order or Preliminary Injunction - 12/17/21
- Order Granting in Part Temporary Restraining Order - 12/22/21
- Defendant's Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order or Preliminary Injunction - 1/3/22
- Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order or Preliminary Injunction - 1/5/22
- Order Extending Temporary Restraining Order - 1/7/22
- Defendant's Answer - 1/12/22
- Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or Alternatively to Stay Proceedings - 1/12/22
- Defendant's Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss, or Alternatively to Stay Proceedings - 1/12/22
- Parties' Joint Motion to Incorporate Prior Briefing - 1/12/22
- Order Granting Preliminary Injunction - 1/13/22
- Order - 1/13/22
- Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or Alternatively to Stay Proceedings - 1/13/22
- Order - 1/18/22
- Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment - 2/7/22
- Plaintiffs' Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment - 2/7/22
- Plaintiffs' Statement of Undisputed Facts - 2/7/22
- Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment - 2/7/22
- Brief in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment - 2/7/22
- Defendant's Statement of Undisputed Facts - 2/7/22
- Order - 2/8/22
- Order Requesting Proposed Map - 2/9/22
- Notice of Nonobjection Regarding Applicability of 22 U.S.C. Section 2284 - 2/11/22
- Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment - 2/22/22
- Defendant's Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment - 2/22/22
- Proposed Final Pretrial Order - 2/28/22
- Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment - 2/28/22
- Joint Proposed Findings of Fact - 2/28/22
- Plaintiffs' Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law - 2/28/22
- Defendant's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law - 2/28/22
- Defendant's Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment - 3/1/22
- Pretrial Order - 3/2/22
- Opinion and Order - 3/8/22
- Judgment - 3/8/22