Case Summary

On July 28, 2020, the State of California, various cities, and civil rights organizations filed a federal lawsuit against President Donald Trump challenging his “Memorandum on Excluding Illegal Aliens from the Apportionment Base Following the 2020 Census” as unconstitutional and unlawful. Plaintiffs argued that the U.S. Constitution and federal Census-related statutes require all persons to be included in official state population counts regardless of their citizenship status and that the President’s memorandum was motivated by discriminatory intent in violation of the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses. They requested a judicial declaration that the memorandum was unlawful and an order requiring the Census Bureau to include undocumented residents in official state population totals.

  • On August 14, 2020, the federal district court consolidated this case with City of San Jose, California v. Trump.
  • On October 22, 2020, the district court held the memorandum violated the U.S. Constitution and federal law and issued an injunction barring its implementation. Defendants filed notices of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court the next day.
  • On January 4, 2021, SCOTUS remanded the case back to the district court with instruction to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction in light of SCOTUS’s ruling in a related case, Trump v. New York. The district court dismissed the case on January 7, 2021.

Case Library

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division - 5:20-cv-05169

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - No. 20-17105 [consolidated with City of San Jose, et al., v. Trump, No. 20-17104]

U.S. Supreme Court - No. 20-561 [together with City of San Jose, et al., v. Trump]