CASE SUMMARY
On October 11, 2021, a former Oregon Secretary of State and several Oregon voters filed a petition in the Oregon Circuit Court for Marion County challenging the Legislative Assembly’s congressional redistricting plan as a pro-Democrat, anti-Republican partisan gerrymander in violation of the Oregon Constitution and state law. They argued the plan’s partisan skew violated the Oregon Constitution’s Free and Equal Elections Clause, Privileges and Immunities Clause, and Freedom of Speech, Assembly, and Participation protections under article I, §§ 8 and 26, as well as the ban on partisan favoritism and redistricting criteria in Oregon Revised Statutes § 188.010. They sought a judicial declaration the plan was unconstitutional and unlawful, an injunction barring the plan from use in future elections, and for the court to require the adoption of a lawful remedial plan.
- On October 14, 2021, the Marion County Circuit Court appointed a special master to review facts and evidence in the case and produce a report outlining their findings, which was filed on November 5, 2021.
- On November 24, 2021, the court upheld the plan and dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims, finding the plaintiffs’ failed to sufficiently support their constitutional claim that the plan had an impermissible partisan effect and rejecting their statutory claim on the grounds the enacted plan was “within the range of plans” that the Oregon Legislative Assembly and courts had adopted in the past and there were no “unreasonable” line-drawing decisions made by the Legislative Assembly here.
CASE LIBRARY
Oregon Circuit Court, Marion County - No. 21CV40180
- Order Appointing Special Judicial Panel to Decide Petitions - 9/28/21
- Petition - 10/11/21
- Letter Requesting Appointment of Special Master - 10/13/21
- Order Appointing Special Master - 10/14/21
- Respondent's Answer to Petition and Affirmative Defenses - 10/18/21
- Declaration of Brian Simmonds Marshall in Support of Legislative Assembly's Combined Motion to Quash Subpoenas and Motion for Protective Order and Memorandum in Support - 10/18/21
- Declaration of Brian Simmonds Marshall in Support of the Response to Petitioners' Motion to Amend Scheduling Order - 10/18/21
- Legislative Assembly's Combined Motion to Quash Subpoenas and Motion for Protective Order and Memorandum in Support - 10/18/21
- Motion to Make More Definite and Certain - 10/18/21
- Response to Motion to Amend Scheduling Order - 10/18/21
- Order on Legislative Assembly's Motion to Quash; Protective Order - 10/20/21
- Respondent's and Legislative Assembly's Motion to Strike - 10/26/21
- Response to Respondent's and Legislative Assembly's Motion to Strike - 10/27/21
- Intervenor-Respondents' Proposed Findings of Fact - 10/29/21
- Motion to Dismiss Petitioners' Fourth Claim for Relief with Prejudice - 10/29/21
- Petitioners' Proposed Findings of Fact - 10/29/21
- Respondent's Proposed Findings of Fact - 10/29/21
- Order Approving Motion to Dismiss Petitioners' Fourth Claim for Relief With Prejudice - 11/1/21
- Special Master's Tentative Findings of Fact - 11/1/21
- Respondent's Memorandum of Law in Support of Respondent's Objections to Petitioners' Evidentiary Submissions - 11/2/21
- Respondent's Objections to the Special Master's Tentative Findings of Fact - 11/2/21
- Petitioners' Objections to Special Master's Tentative Findings of Fact - 11/2/21
- Special Master's Recommended Findings of Fact and Report - 11/5/21
- Petitioners' Memorandum in Support of Petition and in Support of Their Request for Evidentiary and Procedural Rulings - 11/10/21
- Intervenor-Respondents' Memorandum in Opposition to Petition - 11/10/21
- Respondent's Evidentiary Motion and Memorandum - 11/10/21
- Respondent's Trial Memorandum - 11/10/21
- Petitioners' Response Memorandum in Support of Petition and in Opposition to Respondent's Evidentiary Motion - 11/12/21
- Intervenor-Respondents' Response to Petitioners' Memorandum - 11/12/21
- Respondent's Combined Response to Petitioners' Memorandum in Support of Petition and Evidentiary Arguments - 11/12/21
- Order on Evidentiary and Procedural Matters - 11/15/21
- Opinion - 11/24/21
- General Judgment of Dismissal - 11/24/21