CASE SUMMARY
On February 11, 2022, several Pennsylvania voters filed a federal lawsuit against Pennsylvania’s Acting Secretary of the Commonwealth, Governor, and the Director of Pennsylvania’s Bureau of Election Services and Notaries challenging the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s assumption of congressional redistricting authority as violating the U.S. Constitution and federal law. Plaintiffs alleged the Pennsylvania Supreme Court lacked authority to order the adoption of a congressional plan after the state legislature failed to enact a new one because the U.S. Constitution’s Elections Clause vests authority to regulate federal elections solely with the “Legislatures” of each state, and here the Pennsylvania General Assembly did not delegate any of its map-drawing authority to the state’s judiciary. They also claimed the Court lacked authority under 2 U.S.C. § 2(a)(c)(5), which provides that if a state that has lost a congressional seat during reapportionment fails to enact a new congressional map in time for the next primary election, the state must hold at-large elections for all members of congress until a new plan is enacted. They sought a judicial declaration that Pennsylvania was required to hold at-large congressional elections in 2022 and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief requiring the State to continue doing so until a new plan was enacted.
- On February 25, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania denied the plaintiffs’ preliminary injunctive relief request. Three days later, plaintiffs filed an emergency application for writ of injunction with the U.S. Supreme Court seeking to bar the implementation of the state supreme court’s selected congressional plan. SCOTUS denied the application on March 7, 2022.
- On March 16, 2022, the district court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ Elections Clause claim on the grounds they failed to establish an injury-in-fact necessary for standing.
- On March 28, 2022, the plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their case.
CASE LIBRARY
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Williamsport Division - No. 1:22-cv-208
- Complaint - 2/11/22
- First Amended Complaint - 2/20/22
- Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order or Preliminary Injunction - 2/20/22
- Scheduling Order - 2/21/22
- Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction - 2/21/22
- Motion to Intervene as Defendants - 2/22/22
- Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Intervene as Defendants - 2/22/22
- Order - 2/23/22
- Notice to the Court and Renewed Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order - 2/23/22
- Brief in Support of Renewed Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order - 2/23/22
- Defendants' Letter Response to Plaintiffs' Request for Three-Judge Panel - 2/24/22
- Proposed Intervenor-Defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Brief, or, in the Alternative, an Amicus Brief, in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Request to Convene a Three-Judge District Court - 2/24/22
- Brief in Opposition to the Carter Petitioners' Motion to Intervene - 2/24/22
- Declaration of Aaron Bashir - 2/24/22
- Order - 2/25/22
- Carter Petitioners' Reply to Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition to Carter Petitioners' Motion to Intervene as Defendants - 2/25/22
- Order Denying Temporary Restraining Order - 2/25/22
- Reply Brief in Support of Request to Convene Three-Judge Panel - 2/25/22
- Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint - 2/27/22
- Notice of Appeal - 2/28/22
- Order - 2/28/22
- Order Granting Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint - 2/28/22
- Carter Petitioners' Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint - 3/1/22
- Carter Petitioners' Brief in Support of Their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint - 3/1/22
- Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Elections Clause Claims in the Second Amended Complaint - 3/1/22
- Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Elections Clause Claims in the Second Amended Complaint - 3/1/22
- Letter Requesting Three-Judge Court - 3/2/22
- Order Designating Three-Judge Court - 3/4/22
- Response to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction - 3/4/22
- Carter Petitioners' Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint - 3/5/22
- Defendants' Reply Brief in Further Support of Their Motion to Dismiss the Elections Clause Claims in the Second Amended Complaint - 3/5/22
- Order - 3/7/22
- Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction - 3/8/22
- Affidavit of Jonathan Marks - 3/8/22
- Carter Intervenors' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction - 3/8/22
- Carter Intervenors' Notice of Supplemental Authority - 3/9/22
- Notice to the Court Withdrawing Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction - 3/10/22
- Scheduling Order - 3/11/22
- Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint - 3/14/22
- Carter Petitioners' Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint - 3/14/22
- Memorandum Opinion - 3/16/22
- Order - 3/16/22
- Scheduling Order - 3/21/22
- Summary Judgment Joint Appendix - 3/25/22
- Notice of Voluntary Dismissal - 3/28/22
U.S. Supreme Court - No. 21A457
- Emergency Application to Justice Alito for Writ of Injunction - 2/28/22
- Appendix to Emergency Application to Justice Alito for Writ of Injunction - 2/28/22
- Opposition to Emergency Application to Justice Alito for Writ of Injunction - 3/3/22
- Intervenor-Respondents' Response in Opposition to Emergency Application for Writ of Injunction - 3/3/22
- Reply Brief in Support of Emergency Application to Justice Alito for Writ of Injunction - 3/6/22
- Order - 3/7/22