Case Summary
Plaintiffs, the State of Alabama and Congressman Morris J. Brooks, Jr., filed suit in Alabama federal court to challenge the U.S. Census Bureau’s Residence Criteria and Residence Situations Rule (Residence Rule), which provides that foreign nationals living in the United States will be counted in the census and allocated to the state where their usual residence is located—regardless of whether they are legally present in the United States. Plaintiffs argue that inclusion of illegal aliens in the census count will harm Alabama by causing it to lose one congressional seat as well as an electoral vote.
Plaintiffs alleged that the Residence Rule violates several provisions of the U.S. Constitution including Article I, § 2; Article II, § 1; and the Fourteenth Amendment, along with various federal statutes including the Administrative Procedure Act, Reapportionment Act, and Census Act. Plaintiffs are seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent the enforcement of the Residence Rule and to invalidate any reapportionment scheme or vote based upon total population.
On June 5, 2019, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama denied Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and held the Plaintiffs had Article III standing to move forward with their claims. Additionally, the court has permitted several other states, cities, counties, and organizations to intervene as defendants. On October 9, 2020, the court denied the plaintiffs' Motion for the Appointment of a Three-Judge Court to decide the case.
On November 2, 2020, the district court granted the parties' joint motion to stay the case pending the Supreme Court's ruling on a census-related appeal, Trump v. New York, which the Supreme Court dismissed on December 18, 2020. On January 8, 2021, the court granted the parties' second joint motion to stay the proceedings and ordered the plaintiffs to show the court why the injuries they alleged are more than mere predictions by February 10, 2021, or within seven days of the delivery of apportionment figures, whichever is earlier.
On January 20, 2021, President Biden signed an Executive Order directing the Department of Commerce to calculate state population totals and reapportionment figures based upon the whole number of persons in the state without regard to their immigration status, thereby revoking President Trump's Executive Order 13880 and Presidential Memorandum of July 21, 2020.
On May 3, 2021, the parties entered a joint stipulation of dismissal, and the district court dismissed the case on the same day, bringing the lawsuit to an end.
Case Library
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama - 2:18-cv-00772
- Complaint for Declaratory Relief - 5/21/18
- Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss - 11/13/18
- Memorandum Opinion - 12/13/18
- Order - 12/13/18
- Initial Brief of Amicus Curiae Immigration Reform Law - 2/22/19
- Defendants' Reply Submission - 2/25/19
- Memorandum Opinion Seeking Declaratory Judgment - 6/5/19
- Defendants' Answer - 7/19/19
- Local Government Intervenors' Answer and Defenses to Plaintiffs' Complaint - 7/19/19
- Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief - 7/19/19
- First Amended Complaint - 9/10/19
- State and Other Defendant-Intervenors' Answer to First Amended Complaint - 10/1/19
- Defendants' Answer to First Amended Complaint - 10/1/19
- Local Government Intervenors' Answer and Defenses to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint - 10/1/19
- Intervenors' Answer to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint - 10/1/19
- Defendants' Answer to Intervenors' Cross Claim - 12/2/19
- Defendants' Notice of Presidential Memorandum - 7/21/20
- Order - 7/21/20
- Defendants' Notice of Additional Lawsuits Challenging the Recent Presidential Memorandum - 7/29/20
- Plaintiffs' Brief in Response to the Court's July 23, 2020 Briefing Order (Doc. # 153) - 8/3/20
- Opening Brief in Response to the Court's July 21, 2020 Order - 8/3/20
- Defendants' Brief in Response to the Court's July 21, 2020 Order and Request for Scheduling Order - 8/3/20
- Martinez Defendant-Intervenors' Brief Regarding the Effect that the President's July 21, 2020, Memorandum has on the Parties' Claims - 8/3/20
- Reply Brief in Response to the Court’s July 21, 2020 Order - 8/10/20
- Plaintiffs' Response to the Other Parties' Initial Filings Regarding the Court's July 23, 2020 Briefing Order - 8/10/20
- Martinez Intervenors' Response to the Parties' Briefs Regarding the Effects of the July 21, 2020 Presidential Memorandum - 8/10/20
- Defendants' Reply to the Parties' Briefs Concerning the Effect of the July 21, 2020 Presidential Memorandum - 8/10/20
- Plaintiffs' Motion for the Appointment of a Three-Judge Court - 9/23/20
- Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for the Appointment of a Three-Judge Court - 9/30/20
- Joint Status Report - 9/30/20
- Martinez Defendant-Intervenors' Response to Plaintiffs' Request for a Three-Judge Panel - 9/30/20
- Memorandum Opinion and Order - 10/9/20
- Show Cause Order - 10/30/20
- Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings - 10/30/20
- Joint Status Report - 10/30/20
- Order - 11/2/20
- Response from the Local Government Defendant-Intervenors and the State and Other Government Defendant-Intervenors to the Court's October 30 Show Cause Order - 11/4/20
- Joint Motion to Extend the Stay of Proceedings - 1/5/21
- Joint Status Report - 1/6/21
- Order - 1/8/21
- Notice - 1/21/21
- Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice of Martinez Intervenors' Crossclaim Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) - 1/27/21
- Order - 1/28/21
- Response from Plaintiffs to the Court's January 8, 2021 Show Cause Order - 2/4/21
- Federal Defendants' Reply to Plaintiffs' Show-Cause-Order Response - 2/17/21
- State and Other Government Defendant-Intervenors' Response to Plaintiffs' Response to this Court's Order to Show Cause - 2/17/21
- Martinez Defendant-Intervenors' Reply to Plaintiff's Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause - 2/17/21
- Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendants' and Defendant-Intervenors' Responses to the Court's January 8, 2021 Show Cause Order - 2/19/21
- Joint Stipulation of Dismissal - 5/3/21
- Order of Dismissal - 5/3/21